Epistemology - By Branch / Doctrine - The Basics of Philosophy

文章推薦指數: 80 %
投票人數:10人

Epistemology is the study of the nature and scope of knowledge and justified belief. It analyzes the nature of knowledge and how it relates to similar ... Philosophy| ByBranch/Doctrine| ByHistoricalPeriod| ByMovement/School| ByIndividualPhilosopher Ahugesubjectbrokendownintomanageablechunks RandomPhilosophyQuote: ByBranch/Doctrine> Epistemology Introduction|WhatIsKnowledge?|HowIsKnowledgeAcquired?|WhatCanPeopleKnow?|MajorDoctrines  Introduction BacktoTop Epistemologyisthestudyofthenatureandscopeofknowledgeandjustifiedbelief.Itanalyzesthenatureofknowledgeandhowitrelatestosimilarnotionssuchastruth,beliefandjustification.Italsodealswiththemeansofproductionofknowledge,aswellasskepticismaboutdifferentknowledgeclaims.Itisessentiallyaboutissueshavingtodowiththecreationanddisseminationofknowledgeinparticularareasofinquiry. Epistemologyasksquestionslike:"Whatisknowledge?","Howisknowledgeacquired?","Whatdopeopleknow?","Whatarethenecessaryandsufficientconditionsofknowledge?","Whatisitsstructure,andwhatareitslimits?","Whatmakesjustifiedbeliefsjustified?","Howwearetounderstandtheconceptofjustification?","Isjustificationinternalorexternaltoone'sownmind?" ThekindofknowledgeusuallydiscussedinEpistemologyispropositionalknowledge,"knowledge-that"asopposedto"knowledge-how"(forexample,theknowledgethat"2+2=4",asopposedtotheknowledgeofhowtogoaboutaddingtwonumbers). WhatIsKnowledge? BacktoTop Knowledgeistheawarenessandunderstandingofparticularaspectsofreality.Itistheclear,lucidinformationgainedthroughtheprocessofreasonappliedtoreality.Thetraditionalapproachisthatknowledgerequiresthreenecessaryandsufficientconditions,sothatknowledgecanthenbedefinedas"justifiedtruebelief": truth:sincefalsepropositionscannotbeknown-forsomethingtocountasknowledge,itmustactuallybetrue.AsAristotlefamously(butratherconfusingly)expressedit:"Tosayofsomethingwhichisthatitisnot,ortosayofsomethingwhichisnotthatitis,isfalse.However,tosayofsomethingwhichisthatitis,orofsomethingwhichisnotthatitisnot,istrue." belief:becauseonecannotknowsomethingthatonedoesn'tevenbelievein,thestatement"Iknowx,butIdon'tbelievethatxistrue"iscontradictory. justification:asopposedtobelievinginsomethingpurelyasamatterofluck. Themostcontentiouspartofallthisisthedefinitionofjustification,andthereareseveralschoolsofthoughtonthesubject: AccordingtoEvidentialism,whatmakesabeliefjustifiedinthissenseisthepossessionofevidence-abeliefisjustifiedtotheextentthatitfitsaperson'sevidence. DifferentvarietiesofReliabilismsuggestthateither:1)justificationisnotnecessaryforknowledgeprovideditisareliably-producedtruebelief;or2)justificationisrequiredbutanyreliablecognitiveprocess(e.g.vision)issufficientjustification. Yetanotherschool,Infallibilism,holdsthatabeliefmustnotonlybetrueandjustified,butthatthejustificationofthebeliefmustnecessitateitstruth,sothatthejustificationforthebeliefmustbeinfallible. Anotherdebatefocusesonwhetherjustificationisexternalorinternal: Externalismholdsthatfactorsdeemed"external"(meaningoutsideofthepsychologicalstatesofthosewhoaregainingtheknowledge)canbeconditionsofknowledge,sothatiftherelevantfactsjustifyingapropositionareexternalthentheyareacceptable. Internalism,ontheotherhand,claimsthatallknowledge-yieldingconditionsarewithinthepsychologicalstatesofthosewhogainknowledge. Asrecentlyas1963,theAmericanphilosopherEdmundGettiercalledthistraditionaltheoryofknowledgeintoquestionbyclaimingthattherearecertaincircumstancesinwhichonedoesnothaveknowledge,evenwhenalloftheaboveconditionsaremet(hisGettier-cases).Forexample:Supposethattheclockoncampus(whichkeepsaccuratetimeandiswellmaintained)stoppedworkingat11:56pmlastnight,andhasyettoberepaired.Onmywaytomynoonclass,exactlytwelvehourslater,Iglanceattheclockandformthebeliefthatthetimeis11:56.Mybeliefistrue,ofcourse,sincethetimeisindeed11:56.Andmybeliefisjustified,asIhavenoreasontodoubtthattheclockisworking,andIcannotbeblamedforbasingbeliefsaboutthetimeonwhattheclocksays.Nonetheless,itseemsevidentthatIdonotknowthatthetimeis11:56.Afterall,ifIhadwalkedpasttheclockabitearlierorabitlater,Iwouldhaveendedupwithafalsebeliefratherthanatrueone. HowIsKnowledgeAcquired? BacktoTop Propositionalknowledgecanbeoftwotypes,dependingonitssource: apriori(ornon-empirical),whereknowledgeispossibleindependentlyof,orpriorto,anyexperience,andrequiresonlytheuseofreason(e.g.knowledgeoflogicaltruthsandofabstractclaims);or aposteriori(orempirical),whereknowledgeispossibleonlysubsequent,orposterior,tocertainsensoryexperiences,inadditiontotheuseofreason(e.g.knowledgeofthecolororshapeofaphysicalobject,orknowledgeofgeographicallocations). Knowledgeofempiricalfactsaboutthephysicalworldwillnecessarilyinvolveperception,inotherwords,theuseofthesenses.Butallknowledgerequiressomeamountofreasoning,theanalysisofdataandthedrawingofinferences.Intuitionisoftenbelievedtobeasortofdirectaccesstoknowledgeoftheapriori. Memoryallowsustoknowsomethingthatweknewinthepast,even,perhaps,ifwenolongerremembertheoriginaljustification.Knowledgecanalsobetransmittedfromoneindividualtoanotherviatestimony(thatis,myjustificationforaparticularbeliefcouldamounttothefactthatsometrustedsourcehastoldmethatitistrue). Thereareafewmaintheoriesofknowledgeacquisition: Empiricism,whichemphasizestheroleofexperience,especiallyexperiencebasedonperceptualobservationsbythefivesensesintheformationofideas,whilediscountingthenotionofinnateideas.RefinementsofthisbasicprincipleledtoPhenomenalism,Positivism,ScientismandLogicalPositivism. Rationalism,whichholdsthatknowledgeisnotderivedfromexperience,butratherisacquiredbyaprioriprocessesorisinnate(intheformofconcepts)orintuitive. Representationalism(orIndirectRealismorEpistemologicalDualism),whichholdsthattheworldweseeinconsciousexperienceisnottherealworlditself,butmerelyaminiaturevirtual-realityreplicaofthatworldinaninternalrepresentation. Constructivism(orConstructionism),whichpresupposesthatallknowledgeis"constructed",inthatitiscontingentonconvention,humanperceptionandsocialexperience. WhatCanPeopleKnow? BacktoTop Thefactthatanygivenjustificationofknowledgewillitselfdependonanotherbeliefforitsjustificationappearstoleadtoaninfiniteregress. Skepticismbeginswiththeapparentimpossibilityofcompletingthisinfinitechainofreasoning,andarguesthat,ultimately,nobeliefsarejustifiedandthereforenoonereallyknowsanything. Fallibilismalsoclaimsthatabsolutecertaintyaboutknowledgeisimpossible,oratleastthatallclaimstoknowledgecould,inprinciple,bemistaken.UnlikeSkepticism,however,Fallibilismdoesnotimplytheneedtoabandonourknowledge,justtorecognizethat,becauseempiricalknowledgecanberevisedbyfurtherobservation,anyofthethingswetakeasknowledgemightpossiblyturnouttobefalse. Inresponsetothisregressproblem,variousschoolsofthoughthavearisen: Foundationalismclaimsthatsomebeliefsthatsupportotherbeliefsarefoundationalanddonotthemselvesrequirejustificationbyotherbeliefs(self-justifyingorinfalliblebeliefsorthosebasedonperceptionorcertainaprioriconsiderations). Instrumentalismisthemethodologicalviewthatconceptsandtheoriesaremerelyusefulinstruments,andtheirworthismeasuredbyhoweffectivetheyareinexplainingandpredictingphenomena.Instrumentalismthereforedeniesthattheoriesaretruth-evaluable.Pragmatismisasimilarconcept,whichholdsthatsomethingistrueonlyinsofarasitworksandhaspracticalconsequences. Infinitismtypicallytakestheinfiniteseriestobemerelypotential,andanindividualneedonlyhavetheabilitytobringforththerelevantreasonswhentheneedarises.Therefore,unlikemosttraditionaltheoriesofjustification,Infinitismconsidersaninfiniteregresstobeavalidjustification. Coherentismholdsthatanindividualbeliefisjustifiedcircularlybythewayitfitstogether(coheres)withtherestofthebeliefsystemofwhichitisapart,sothattheregressdoesnotproceedaccordingtoapatternoflinearjustification. Foundherentismisanotherpositionwhichismeanttobeaunificationoffoundationalismandcoherentism. MajorDoctrines BacktoTop UndertheheadingofEpistemology,themajordoctrinesortheoriesinclude: Constructivism Deconstructionism Empiricism Externalism Fallibilism Foundationalism Historicism Holism Internalism Instrumentalism LogicalPositivism(LogicalEmpiricism) OrdinaryLanguagePhilosophy Phenomenalism Positivism Pragmatism Rationalism Representationalism Scientism Skepticism Verificationism BacktoTopofPage Philosophy| WhatisPhilosophy?| ByBranch/Doctrine| ByHistoricalPeriod| ByMovement/School| ByIndividualPhilosopher   Thankyouforsupportingphilosophy! DonatewithCrypto Thearticlesonthissiteare©2008-.Ifyouquotethismaterialpleasebecourteousandprovidealink.Citations|FAQs|Inquiries|PrivacyPolicy  



請為這篇文章評分?